Economic Valuation of Biodiversity Services in Tanjung Puting National Park Using the Willingness to Pay Approach
Abstract
Biodiversity constitutes a fundamental pillar of sustainable development by providing ecological, social, and economic benefits. National parks play a crucial role in conserving biodiversity while simultaneously delivering ecosystem services that support human well-being. However, many of these services are non-market in nature and are often undervalued in policy-making processes. This study aims to estimate the economic value of biodiversity services in Tanjung Puting National Park using the Willingness to Pay (WTP) approach and to analyze socio-demographic factors influencing visitors’ willingness to contribute to conservation efforts. Data were collected through a structured survey administered to visitors and local communities. The results indicate that respondents demonstrate a positive willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation, with income, education level, and environmental perception significantly influencing WTP values. These findings provide empirical evidence to support conservation financing strategies and sustainable management policies for national parks.
References
Barbier, E. B., Hacker, S. D., Kennedy, C., Koch, E. W., Stier, A. C., & Silliman, B. R. (2011). The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecological Monographs, 81(2), 169–193.
Bateman, I. J., Carson, R. T., Day, B., Hanemann, M., Hanley, N., Hett, T., Jones-Lee, M., Loomes, G., Mourato, S., Özdemiroğlu, E., Pearce, D. W., Sugden, R., & Swanson, J. (2002). Economic valuation with stated preference techniques: A manual. Edward Elgar.
Blicharska, M., Smithers, R., Mikusiński, G., Rönnbäck, P., Harrison, P. A., Nilsson, M., & Sutherland, W. J. (2019). Biodiversity’s contributions to sustainable development. Nature Sustainability, 2(12), 1083. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0417-9
Brander, L., Groot, R. S. de, Schägner, J. P., Guisado-Goñi, V., Hoff, V. van ’t, Solomonides, S., McVittie, A., Eppink, F. V., Sposato, M., Do, H.-L., Ghermandi, A., Sinclair, M., & Thomas, R. J. (2024). Economic values for ecosystem services: A global synthesis and way forward. Ecosystem Services, 66, 101606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101606
Burke, L., Reytar, K., Spalding, M., & Perry, A. L. (2011). Reefs at Risk Revisited. https://files.wri.org/d8/s3fs-public/pdf/reefs_at_risk_revisited_executive_summary.pdf
Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P., & van den Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630), 253–260.
Cruz, P. M. C. D. L. (2021). The Knowledge Status of Coastal and Marine Ecosystem Services - Challenges, Limitations and Lessons Learned From the Application of the Ecosystem Services Approach in Management. Frontiers in Marine Science, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.684770
Freeman, A. M., Herriges, J. A., & Kling, C. L. (2014). The measurement of environmental and resource values: Theory and methods (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Hanemann, W. M. (1994). Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(4), 19–43.
Heal, G. (2020). The Economic Case for Protecting Biodiversity. https://doi.org/10.3386/w27963
Krutilla, J. V. (1967). Conservation reconsidered. The American Economic Review, 57(4), 777–786.
López-Mosquera, N., & Sánchez, M. (2012). Theory of planned behavior and the value-belief-norm theory explaining willingness to pay for a suburban park. Journal of Environmental Management, 113, 251–262.
Mitchell, R. C., & Carson, R. T. (1989). Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method. Resources for the Future.
Pearce, D. W., & Turner, R. K. (1990). Economics of natural resources and the environment. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Pribadi, H., Rahman, A., Umar, S., Alam, A. S., Setiawan, B., & Fathan, M. (2023). Nilai Ekonomi Biodiversitas Pada Rotasi Pengelolaan Hutan Kemiri (Aleurites Moluccana L. Willd.) di Daerah Penyangga Taman Nasional Lore Lindu. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan, 21(4), 796. https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.21.4.796-806
Togridou, A., Hovardas, T., & Pantis, J. D. (2006). Determinants of visitors’ willingness to pay for the National Marine Park of Zakynthos, Greece. Ecological Economics, 60(1), 308–319.
Tomczyk, A., White, P. C. L., & Ewertowski, M. (2015). Effects of extreme natural events on the provision of ecosystem services in a mountain environment: The importance of trail design in delivering system resilience and ecosystem service co-benefits. Journal of Environmental Management, 166, 156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.10.016
Wang, P., & Jia, J. (2012). Tourists’ willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation and environment protection, Dalai Lake protected area: Implications for entrance fee and sustainable management. Ocean & Coastal Management, 62, 24–33.
Whittington, D. (2010). What have we learned from 20 years of stated preference research in less-developed countries? Annual Review of Resource Economics, 2, 209–236.
Yelboğa, M. N. M., Sayın, C., & Metin, F. D. (2022). The Current Issues About Waste Prevention and Willingness to Pay: A Case Study of Greenhouse Production in Turkey. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 32(1), 419. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/153913
.jpg)










