ANALYSIS OF THE WELFARE LEVEL OF LEBAK SWAMP RICE FARMERS AT A CROPPING INDEX (IP) OF 100 AND IP OF 200 IN GELEBAK DALAM VILLAGE RAMBUTAN  DISTRICT BANYUASIN REGENCY

Felyn Muharani; Indri Januarti

doi:10.61992/jiem.v8i2.387

Felyn Muharani
Indri Januarti Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.61992/jiem.v8i2.387

Keywords: Cropping Index, Lebak Swampland, Farmer Income, Income Contribution, Farmer Welfare.

Abstract

The swamp land in Banyuasin Regency, especially in Gelebak Dalam Village, Rambutan District, has great potential for rice farming development but its utilization has not been optimal. The government has implemented a program to increase the Cropping Index (IP) from 100 to 200 to improve land productivity and farmer welfare. The objectives of this study are (1) To calculate the income of swamp rice farming businesses with IP 100 and IP 200 in Gelebak Dalam Village, Rambutan District, Banyuasin Regency, (2) To calculate the contribution of rice farming income to the total household income of swamp rice farmers with IP 100 and IP 200 in Gelebak Dalam Village, Rambutan District, Banyuasin Regency, and (3) To compare the welfare levels of swamp rice farmers with IP 100 and IP 200 in Gelebak Dalam Village, Rambutan District, Banyuasin Regency. This research was conducted in Gelebak Dalam Village, Rambutan District, Banyuasin Regency in November 2025. The research method used was a survey method with a quantitative descriptive approach and a sampling method using disproportionate stratified random sampling. The data used were primary data obtained through structured interviews and secondary data from related agencies. The results of this study are (1) The income of IP 100 rice farming business was IDR4,210,393/month or IDR50,524,716/year, while IP 200 was IDR7,925,852/month or IDR91,885,282/year. The total household income of IP 100 farmers reached IDR5,999,560/month or IDR71,994,720/year, while IP 200 reached IDR9,153,185/month or IDR130,853,282/year, (2) The contribution of rice farming income to household income for IP 100 farmers was 70.17% (dominant) and IP 200 farmers was 86.59% (dominant), with a difference in contribution of 16.42%, (3) Based on the Decent Living Needs (KHL) indicator, there were 21 families (70%) of IP 100 farmers and 22 families (73.5%) of IP 200 farmers. The t-test results show a significant difference between the welfare levels of farmers with an IP of 100 and an IP of 200, with the welfare levels of farmers with an IP of 200 being higher than those with an IP of 100.

References

Adistya, A., & Aryani, D. (2023). Komparasi Pendapatan dan Determinan Produksi Padi Rawa Lebak Indeks Pertanaman 100 dan 200 di Kecamatan Kumpeh Ulu, Muaro Jambi. Jurnal MeA (Media Agribisnis), 8(2), 126-134.
Arianti, T. F., Adriani, D., & Aryani, D. (2022, March). Determinan Keputusan Petani Padi Sawah Tadah Hujan dalam Penerapan IP 200 di Kabupaten Muara Enim. In Forum Agribisnis: Agribusiness Forum (Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 76-87).
Armides, Y. P., & Iskandar, S. (2026). Produktivitas Usahatani Padi Rawa Lebak Pematang IP 300 di Desa Air Balui Kecamatan Sanga Desa Kabupaten Musi Banyuasin. Societa: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Agribisnis, 14(2), 53-61.
Astuti, W. (2024). Kontribusi Sektor Pertanian Padi Dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Perekonomian Masyarakat Desa Lonam Kecamatan Pemangkat Dalam Persfektif Ekonomi Islam. Lunggi Journal, 2(4), 590-600.
Hermanto, & Swastika, D. K. S 2021. Penguatan Kelompok Tani: Langkah Awal Peningkatan Kesejahteraan Petani. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian, 19(2), Halaman 89-108.
Indonesia, B. P. S. 2024. Badan pusat statistik Indonesia. Statistik Indonesia, 1101001, 03200.24003.
Indonesia, B. P. S. 2025. Badan pusat statistik Indonesia. Statistik Indonesia, 1101001, 03200.25004.
Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. 2021. Profil Kesehatan Indonesia Tahun 2021. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia.
Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia.(2021). Profil Kesehatan Indonesia Tahun 2021. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia.
Kementerian Pertanian. 2021. Rencana Strategis Kementerian Pertanian Tahun 2020-2024. Jakarta: Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia.
Kementerian Pertanian. 2022. Pedoman Teknis Peningkatan Indeks Pertanaman pada Lahan Rawa. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Prasarana dan Sarana Pertanian.
Lohr, S. L. 2021. Sampling: design and analysis. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Maihani, S., Jamilah, M., & Yamani, S. A. Z. (2021). Krisis tenaga kerja pertanian petani muda masa depan. Jurnal Sains Pertanian, 5(2), 85-91.
Mulyana, E., Sriati, S., Yamin, M. Y. M., & Yunita, Y. (2023). Pengaruh Kearifan Lokal Terhadap Pendapatan Usahatani Padi Rawa Lebak di Desa Sungai Pinang Iii Kecamatan Sungai Pinang Kabupaten Ogan Ilir. Journal of Economics and Business UBS, 12(2), 1240-1256.
Nurzakiah, S., Harwanto, R., & Yulianto, Y. 2022. Karakteristik Lahan Rawa Lebak dan Potensinya untuk Pengembangan Pertanian Padi di Sumatera Selatan. Jurnal Lahan Suboptimal, 11(1), Halaman 45-56.
Prayoga, K., Sugiarti, D., & Wibowo, A. 2021. Analisis Pendapatan dan Efisiensi Usahatani Padi dengan Indeks Pertanaman Berbeda di Kabupaten Karawang. Jurnal Agribisnis Indonesia, 9(2), Halaman 123-136.
Simatupang, P., & Maulana, M. 2021. Kebijakan Peningkatan Kesejahteraan Petani: Analisis Nilai Tukar Petani dan Determinannya. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi, 39(1), Halaman 1-18.
Statistik, B. P. 2025. Sumatera Selatan dalam angka. Badan Statistik Propinsi Sumatera Selatan, 1102001.16.
Syailendra, R., Umikalsum, R. A., & Azmi, N. (2025). Tantangan Dan Permasalahan Penerapan Padi Ip 200 Di Lahan Rawa Lebak Kelurahan Kertapati Kecamatan Keramasan Kota Palembang. PlantIBA: Jurnal Riset Pertanian, 2(2), 30-50.
Tierney, J. F., Fisher, D. J., Burdett, S., sStewart, L. A., & Parmar, M. K. B. (2020). Comparison of aggregate and individual participant data approaches to meta-analysis of randomised trials: An observational study. PLoS Medicine, 17(1).