Stakeholder Mapping in the Management in Lingga Isaq Hunting Park Protected Area, Aceh Tengah
Abstract
Stakeholder mapping is an important step in managing conservation areas to understand and involve interested parties in decision making. Bur Lingga Isaq Park in Central Aceh is a conservation area that has high biodiversity and is important to preserve. This research aims to carry out stakeholder mapping in the management of Bur Lingga Isaq Park, identify the interests and roles of each stakeholder, and evaluate their level of involvement in decision making regarding conservation areas. The research methods used include document analysis, interviews, and participant observation. The collected data was analyzed descriptively and using stakeholder analysis tools such as interest and power matrices. The research results show that there are several stakeholders involved in the management of Bur Lingga Isaq Park, including local government, local communities, non-government organizations, and educational institutions. Their interests include economic, social, cultural and conservation aspects. The level of stakeholder involvement varies, with some stakeholders having a more dominant role in decision making. These findings provide valuable insights for conservation area managers in strengthening collaboration with stakeholders and ensuring continued participation in decision making. In the context of Bur Lingga Isaq Park, an inclusive and sustainable framework is needed to ensure successful management of conservation areas. This research also provides a basis for further studies in identifying more effective and sustainable management strategies by involving diverse stakeholders and interests in the management of conservation areas.
References
Antoro SK. 2010. Natural resource conflicts in iron sand mining areas: a study of the implications of regional autonomy (Case study in Kulon Progo Regency, Special Region of Yogyakarta Province. Bogor (ID): Bogor Agricultural Institute.
Asikin M. 2001. Stakeholdersi: Participation in SME Policy Design and Implementation. Jakarta (ID): ADB technical assistance SME development.
Fedora, SD & Hudiyono, RF 2019. Stakeholder analysis in the public relations unit (PR) and secretariat of PT Semen Padang. Journal of Business Administration, 2:12-19.
Kartodihardjo H. 2013. Problems of forestry thinking and practice: reflection and evaluation. In Kartodihardjo H (Ed), Back to the straight path: Critique of the use of forestry science and practice. Yogyakarta (ID): Nailil Printika.
Prayogo D. 2010. Anatomy of conflict between corporations and local communities in the geothermal industry in West Java. J Makara, Social Humanities. 14(1):25 34
Prasetyo LB. 2017. Landscape Ecology Approach to Biodiversity Conservation. Bogor (ID): Faculty of Forestry, Bogor Agricultural Institute
Sugandhy A. 1999. Spatial Planning in Environmental Management. Jakarta (ID): Gramedia Pustaka Utama
Sinabutar P. Nugroho B, Katodihardhjo H, Darusman D. 2014. Legal certainty and the recognition of the parties as a result of strengthening the national forest area in Riau Province. J Forestry Policy Analysis. 12(1):27-40.
Sharma U. 1990. An overview of park-people interaction in Royal Chitwan National Park. Nepal. Landscape Urban Planning. 19(2):133–144
Kusumedi P, Rizal A. 2010. Stakeholder analysis and Maros model KPH development policy in South Sulawesi Province. J Forestry Policy Analysis. 7 (3): 179-193
Meyers J. 2001. Stakeholder power analysis. In Suporahrdjo (edit). Collaboration Management: Understanding Pluralism Building Consensus. Latin Library. Bogor. pp. 161-204
Mukhtar AS. 2002. Management study of Gunung Masigit-Kareumbi Hunting Park, West Java. Proceedings of the National Seminar on Bioecology and Ungulata Conservation. Forest Research and Development Center and Nature Conservation Ministry of Forestry. pp. 87–103.
Morgera E, Wingard J. 2008. Principles for Developing Sustainable Wildlife Management Laws. FAO. Roma
Qodriyatun, SN 2019. The role and participation of communities in collaborative management of conservation areas. Journal of Studies, 24:43-56.
Reed MS, Graves A, Dandy N, Posthumus H, Hubacek, K, Morris J, Stringer LC. 2009. Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5):1933–1949.
Susanne Raum. 2018. A framework for integrating systematic stakeholder analysis in ecosystem services research: Stakeholder mapping for forest ecosystem services in the UK. Journal Ecosystem Services Volume 29, Part A, February 2018, Pages 170-184
Wakka AK 2014. Stakeholder analysis of special purpose forest area management (KHDT K) Mengkendek, Tana Toraja Regency, South Sulawesi Province. Wallace Forestry Research Journal. 3 (1) : 47–55.
