THE EFFECT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF GREATDAY ATTENDANCE IMPLEMENTATION AND WORK ENVIRONMENT ON EMPLOYEE WORK DISCIPLINE AT XYZ SCHOOL, BEKASI CITY
Abstract
The Effect of the Effectiveness of GreatDay Attendance Implementation and Work Environment on Employee Work Discipline at XYZ School, Bekasi City. Employee work discipline is one of the key factors in improving organizational performance and productivity, particularly in educational institutions. In the digitalization era, the implementation of digital attendance systems such as GreatDay is expected to improve the effectiveness of attendance management and encourage employee discipline. However, the effectiveness of implementing the digital attendance system still faces various challenges, while the work environment is also presumed to influence employees' level of discipline. This study aims to analyze the effect of the effectiveness of GreatDay attendance implementation and the work environment on employee work discipline at XYZ School, Bekasi City. This study used a quantitative approach with descriptive and verificative methods. The research population consisted of all employees at XYZ School, Bekasi City, totaling 75 people. The sampling technique used was saturated sampling; therefore, the entire population was used as the research sample. Data were collected through questionnaires using a 1-5 Likert scale distributed to 75 respondents. Data analysis techniques employed multiple linear regression analysis using SPSS version 25, including classical assumption tests (normality, multicollinearity, heteroscedasticity), t-test (partial), F-test (simultaneous), and coefficient of determination (R²). The results show that: (1) the Effectiveness of GreatDay Attendance Implementation has a partial and significant effect on Employee Work Discipline with a significance value of 0.000 < 0.05 and a coefficient of determination of 15.9%; (2) Work Environment has a partial and significant effect on Employee Work Discipline with a significance value of 0.004 < 0.05 and a coefficient of determination of 11.1%; (3) the Effectiveness of GreatDay Attendance Implementation and Work Environment simultaneously have a significant effect on Employee Work Discipline with a significance value of 0.000 < 0.05 and a coefficient of determination of 42.3%. This indicates that both independent variables together explain 42.3% of the variation in employee work discipline, while the remaining 57.7% is influenced by other variables outside this study. Based on these findings, it can be concluded that the effectiveness of GreatDay attendance implementation and the work environment significantly affect employee work discipline, both partially and simultaneously. Therefore, XYZ School, Bekasi City, is advised to improve the effectiveness of GreatDay attendance implementation through more intensive training, improved technological infrastructure, and systematic monitoring and evaluation, as well as to create a conducive work environment by enhancing the workplace atmosphere, harmonizing inter-employee relationships, and providing adequate work facilities to improve employee work discipline.
References
Alpiansyah, F. (2019). The Effect of Quality of Work Life and Work Environment on Work Discipline among Employees of PT. Bank Negara Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen, 15(2), 123-145.
Arvey, R. D., & Jones, A. P. (2018). The Psychology of Discipline in Organizations. New York: Academic Press.
Bayu, I. (2020). The Effect of Discipline and Employee Commitment on Employee Performance. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 12(3), 234-251.
Case Study. (2020). GreatDay HR Digital Attendance System Implementation in Payroll Processes. Jurnal Sistem Informasi, 8(1), 45-62.
Dalimunthe, N. W. (2023). The Effect of Online Attendance on Employee Work Discipline. Jurnal Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, 9(2), 156-173.
Dharmawan, A. (2011). Work Environment Management. Jakarta: Publisher.
Fayol, H. (1916). General and Industrial Management. London: Pitman Publishing.
Follet, M. P. (1924). Creative Experience. New York: Longmans, Green and Co.
Fraser. (2006). Job Satisfaction Theory. In Wahyudi, Work Environment Management (p. 5). Jakarta.
Gibson, J. L. (2001). Organizations: Behavior, Structure, Processes (10th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Ghozali, I. (2012). Multivariate Analysis Application with IBM SPSS 21 Program (5th ed.). Semarang: Diponegoro University Press.
Herzberg, F. (1959). The Motivation to Work. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Hijrah, N. (2024). The Effect of Supervision, Commitment, and Work Discipline on Employee Performance. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 10(1), 78-95.
Konradus. (2008). Work Environment Management. In Sukmawati, A. (Ed.), Human Resource Management (p. 177). Jakarta: Publisher.
Lewa, & Subowo. (2005). Work Environment Management. Jakarta: Publisher.
Luthans, F. (2011). Organizational Behavior: An Evidence-Based Approach (12th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Mardiasmo. (2017). Public Sector Accounting. Yogyakarta: Publisher.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Mill. (2006). Work Environment Theory. In Wahyudi, Work Environment Management (p. 5). Jakarta: Publisher.
Miller. (2005). Organizational Effectiveness Theory. In Tangkilisan, H. N. S., Public Management (p. 138). Jakarta: Publisher.
Nitisemito, A. S. (2008). Personnel Management. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Nitisermo. (2005). Work Environment Theory. In Lewa & Subowo, Work Environment Management (p. 130). Jakarta: Publisher.
Noor, J. (2011). Research Methodology: Thesis, Dissertation, and Scientific Work. Jakarta: Kencana.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2019). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Its Nature, Antecedents, and Consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Putra, R. A., & Hidayat, A. (2023). Work Discipline Management. Jakarta: Publisher.
Rahmat, et al. (2022). Theory and Practice of Human Resource Management. Bandung: Publisher.
Ranupandoyo, H., & Masnan. (2016). Human Resource Management. In Sutrisno, E. (Ed.), Human Resource Management (p. 94). Yogyakarta: Publisher.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational Behavior (17th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Sanusi, A. (2012). Business Research Methodology. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach (7th ed.). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
Sedarmayanti. (2009). Human Resources and Work Productivity. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Sedarmayanti. (2013). Human Resource Management: Bureaucratic Reform and Civil Service Management. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Sinambela, L. P. (2020). Quantitative Research Methodology. Jakarta: Kencana.
Singodimedjo. (2016). Work Discipline Management. In Sutrisno, E. (Ed.), Human Resource Management (p. 94). Yogyakarta: Publisher.
Sugiyono. (2014). Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2017). Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods (2nd ed.). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suliyanto. (2011). Applied Econometrics: Theory and Application with SPSS. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
Sukmawati, A. (2008). Human Resource Management. Jakarta: Publisher.
Sutrisno, E. (2016). Human Resource Management. Yogyakarta: Publisher.
Tangkilisan, H. N. S. (2005). Public Management. Jakarta: Publisher.
Taylor, F. W. (1911). The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Harper & Brothers.
Terry, G. R. (1960). Principles of Management (3rd ed.). Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
Wahyudi. (2006). Work Environment Management. Jakarta: Publisher.
Weber, M. (1922). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Wibowo, H. M., Budiraharjo, J., & Madiistriyatno, H. (2023). Management: Theory and Practice. Jakarta: Publisher.
Wijaya, T. (2021). Work Discipline Management in Organizations. Jakarta: Publisher.
Wursanto, I. (2009). Human Resource Management. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
.jpg){kind=logo}
